Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace2020.uniten.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21110
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShaaya S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMusirin I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSulaiman S.I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMansor M.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSyed Mustaffa S.A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T07:04:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T07:04:26Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace2020.uniten.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21110-
dc.description.abstractPlacing Distributed generation (DG) into a power network should be planned wisely. In this paper, the comparison of having different installation arrangement of real-power DGs in transmission system for loss control is presented. Immune-brainstorm-evolutionary programme (IBSEP) was chosen as the optimization technique. It is found that optimizing fixed-size DGs locations gives the highest loss reduction percentage. Apart from that, scattered small-sized DGs throughout a network minimizes transmission loss more than allocating one biger-sized DG at a location. © 2019 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of distributed generation installation arrangement in transmission system for loss controlen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:UNITEN Ebook and Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
This document is not yet available.pdf
  Restricted Access		396.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.